Claude
Thinking partner
Synthesis, long-form drafts, critique, and finding the sentence underneath the sentence.
Check: A fluent answer is not automatically a considered one.
Morocco / worldwide
Resources / working stack
Models and tools are materials, not an identity. This is a living record of what I have tried, what I return to, and where each tool earns its place.
The useful question is rarely “what is the best tool?” It is “what kind of attention does this tool give back to me?”
Models
Thinking partner
Synthesis, long-form drafts, critique, and finding the sentence underneath the sentence.
Check: A fluent answer is not automatically a considered one.
Prototype lab
Private app experiments, multimodal exploration, and turning a rough direction into something testable.
Check: A working preview still needs a human check for structure, taste, and truth.
Build partner
Reasoning, code, workflow design, research framing, and the patient middle between idea and release.
Check: A confident plan can still miss the constraint that matters most.
Reasoning alternative
A second pass on coding and reasoning, especially when I want to compare quality, speed, and cost trade-offs.
Check: I keep the model and prompt recorded before treating a result as a useful comparison.
Long-range experiment
Testing sustained coding, visual or GUI work, and multilingual problem-solving without handing over the decision.
Check: Long context is only useful when the model keeps the real goal in view.
Inference layer
Fast hosted inference for quick passes. The underlying model is part of the record, not a footnote.
Check: Speed is not a quality signal; I judge the actual model output.
Tools
Design system
Identity studies, interface systems, editable exploration, and the place where visual decisions become shareable.
Check: A polished file can still hide a weak decision.
Web prototype
Fast, expressive website builds when motion, publishing, and visual feedback need to stay close together.
Check: Motion should clarify the experience, not perform competence.
Source and history
Code, decisions, reviewable changes, and a hand-off that does not depend on someone remembering the whole story.
Check: A commit is evidence of a change, not proof that the change is useful.
Wiwedo delivery
The current hosting layer for wiwedo.com. Kept separate from this personal publishing surface.
Check: Delivery infrastructure should stay boring and observable.
Publishing
A readable second home for selected essays. The personal site remains the canonical source.
Check: Distribution should not flatten the idea into platform language.
Continuity layer
A private place to keep building, test a direction, and carry context forward without turning the brief into public copy.
Check: The copilot can accelerate a wrong direction just as quickly.
Working method
The same small set of tasks tells me more than a leaderboard: what survives contact with the brief, the interface, the language, and the responsibility attached to the work.
The final judgment stays with me.
How I choose
01
Does the tool make a difficult part of the work lighter without making the decision less visible?
02
Can I inspect, edit, export, and leave when the tool is no longer the right fit?
03
Does it understand the language, audience, medium, and constraints of the thing being made?
04
What still needs a human yes, no, or not yet?
This list changes as the work changes. Notes explain the decisions; the stack is just the trace.
Back to the learning trail ↗